On 12/28/2010 5:39 AM, Thomas Heller wrote: > I just saw that you added functional::at. > I was wondering about the rationale of your decision to make it a non > template. > My gut feeling would have been to have proto::functional::at<N>(seq) > and not proto::functional::at(seq, N).
Think of the case of Phoenix placeholders, where in the index is a parameter: when< terminal<placeholder<_> >, _at(_state, _value) > For the times when the index is not a parameter, you can easily do: _at(_state, mpl::int_<N>()) -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ proto mailing list proto@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
