On 6/14/2012 12:03 AM, Joel Falcou wrote: > Just a question that just struck me. Will this rewrite be backward > compatible with C++03 for the features that make sense ? I think the > C++03 version may benefit from the new expression extension mechanism etc.
'Fraid not. The new extension mechanism is a breaking interface change to proto::domain. The proto you know in boost will stay as it is. -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ proto mailing list proto@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto