On 07/15/2012 10:25 AM, Bart Janssens wrote:
OK, thanks for the comments. It's similar to what I had in mind, but (unless I'm missing something) all product terms in our expressions should have a distinct type if they represent different values, so I could get away with just using a fusion map and avoid the copying and even the map lookup.
In which case, you can replace the std::map<Expr, result_type> by a boost::optional<result_type>.
_______________________________________________ proto mailing list proto@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
