On 7/26/2012 10:26 PM, Joel Falcou wrote: > Yeah i figured the code was amiss. > After corrections and using your tip, it works.
Good. > The I discovered it was not what I wanted ;) Oops. :-) > What I actually need to do is that when I encounter a bunch of > bitwise_and_ node, I need to flatten them then pass this flattened > tree + the initial tuple to the equivalent of fusion transform that will > do: > > skeleton_grammar(current, current value from state, current > external_transforms) > > I guess proto::functional::transform is not there and need to be done > by hand ? You mean, a proto callable that wraps fusion::transform? No, we don't have one yet. If you write one, I'll put it in proto. Naming is becoming an issue, though. We already have proto::transform. You'd be adding proto::functional::transform that would be totally unrelated. I think I screwed up with the namespaces. It should probably be proto::functional::fusion::transform. Urg. -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ proto mailing list proto@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/proto
