On Oct 6, 3:14 pm, Ben J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are any of the C# protobuf implementations close to being stable? I
> checked the sites and couldn't really tell (although maybe I missed
> something).

The backing library for my implementation (whatever you want to call
it!) is pretty stable, but the code generator isn't. Or rather, the
code generator as part of protoc is stable at v2.0.1. I'm working on a
code generator implemented in C# itself, which will take the binary
output of protoc and generate C#. That will take a little while to
finish, unfortunately.

I can't remember the status of what's in github, but if you don't mind
the 2.0.1 restriction you could probably use protoc from there for the
moment. You'll need to change your .proto files to use the new
language-specific-option syntax when the new generator's finished, of
course, but that shouldn't be much of an issue.

I'd welcome any testers for my implementation, and could certainly
give help/advice if you run into any issues.

Jon

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to