On Oct 31, 5:19 am, "Petar Petrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, there are plans to improve performance. I have spent a little time on > this without significant improvements. > I think performance can hardly get a drastic improvement without a C++ > extension module (which we are planning to have).
Are you aware of anyone doing any work on a C++ Boost::Python interface for PB? This would seem to be a relatively easy thing to write, implementing the __getattr__/__setattr__ Python methods in Boost::Python to interface to the reflection mechanism in PB. If noone else is doing it, I might try this myself & pass it on if it works. Regards, Jeff --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
