Sounds fine to me, but it's up to Petar (cc'd).

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Alan Kligman <alan.klig...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Ya, that's exactly what I'm experimenting with now and precisely what
> I'm looking for. Would be perfect if the callback had a default value
> of None too.
>
> a
>
> On Jan 7, 10:02 pm, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> > I believe there was a proposal internally that if the caller passes None
> for
> > the callback, the RPC implementation should block until completion and
> then
> > return the result.  Does that seem like what you want?
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Alan Kligman <alan.klig...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I poked around a bit and the code above isn't correct (for a couple of
> > > reasons). But the question remains: should stubs be generated that
> > > return the response down the callstack instead of passing it through a
> > > callback function?
> >
> > > On Jan 7, 5:59 pm, Alan Kligman <alan.klig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Does it make sense to change
> >
> > > >     stub.rpc_channel.CallMethod(
> > > >         method_descriptor, rpc_controller, request,
> > > >         method_descriptor.output_type._concrete_class, callback)
> >
> > > > to
> >
> > > >     return stub.rpc_channel.CallMethod(
> > > >         method_descriptor, rpc_controller, request,
> > > >         method_descriptor.output_type._concrete_class,
> callback=lambda
> > > > x:None)
> > > > in python/google/protobuf/service_reflection.py?
> >
> > > > If, for example, I'm running in a single thread and my underlying
> > > > channel is blocking, it's strange to pass a callback in when control
> > > > would normally return to the calling method after CallMethod has
> > > > completed synchronously.
> >
> > > > Thoughts?
> >
> > > > a
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to