Sorry, we're trying to get it implemented in Java and Python first. I'm reviewing the Java implementation today. (Protobuf development can be slow since no one works on it as their main project...) On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Caleb <caleb.epst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Dec 3 2008, 2:53 pm, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:14 AM, gregg <greggh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > What's the status of the "packed" option for repeated fields? Is this > > > still intended for a future protobuf release? I searched for "packed" > > > and the last post in this group about it was in August. > > > > Coincidentally, I'm currently in the process of reviewing a change that > > implements this. It probably won't be in 2.0.3, but may reach SVN in a > week > > or two. > > Bump. Any news on this? I don't see anything relevant in the public > SVN repo. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
