This was a bug in 2.1.0rc1 that was fixed for the final release. Download
2.1.0 here:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/list
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Alexey Yakubovich <alexe...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Kenton,
>
> Thanks for your help, C++ works for me, but not quite. I have on my
> mashine two PB version: protobuf-2.0.3 and protobuf-2.1.0rc1. The
> first build (for C++) works just fine. The socong build results in an
> error, output is at the end of the current message. The actual error
> msg is (if I got it right):
>
> ambiguous overload for 'operator<<' in '(+(+(+(+(&LogMessage ...
>
> and then
>
> Extension conflicts with extension already in database
>
> What is this database? Can you have more then one instance (different
> versions) of PB on your machine (Windows)?
>
> Because, you see, the version protobuf-2.0.3 for Python requires
> Python 2.5 and try to download setuptools that is not actuyally
> available any more... But that is different issue...
> So I have now two PB versions, but also having some problems.
>
> Thanks
>
> Alexey
>
> $ make
> make all-recursive
> make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/d/JavaFT/protobuf-2.1.0rc1'
> Making all in .
> make[2]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/d/JavaFT/protobuf-2.1.0rc1'
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/d/JavaFT/protobuf-2.1.0rc1'
> Making all in src
> make[2]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/d/JavaFT/protobuf-2.1.0rc1/src'
> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
> -
> Wall -Wwrite-strings -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-sign-compare -O2 -g -DNDEBUG
> -MT
> descriptor_database.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/descriptor_database.Tpo -c -o
> descripto
> r_database.lo `test -f 'google/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc' || echo
> './'`goo
> gle/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Woverloaded-virtual
> -Wno-si
> gn-compare -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -MT descriptor_database.lo -MD -MP -MF
> .deps/descript
> or_database.Tpo -c google/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc -DDLL_EXPORT
> -DPIC -o
> .libs/descriptor_database.o
> google/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc: In member function `bool
> google::protobu
> f::SimpleDescriptorDatabase::DescriptorIndex<Value>::AddExtension(const
> google::
> protobuf::FieldDescriptorProto&, Value) [with Value = const
> google::protobuf::Fi
> leDescriptorProto*]':
> google/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc:75: instantiated from `bool
> google::pro
> tobuf::SimpleDescriptorDatabase::DescriptorIndex<Value>::AddFile(const
> google::p
> rotobuf::FileDescriptorProto&, Value) [with Value = const
> google::protobuf::File
> DescriptorProto*]'
> google/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc:263: instantiated from here
> google/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc:159: error: ambiguous overload for
> 'opera
> tor<<' in '(+(+(+(+(&LogMessage( LOGLEVEL_ERROR, ((const
> char*)"google/protobuf/
> descriptor_database.cc"),
> 159))->google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operato
> r<<(((const char*)"Extension conflicts with extension already in database:
> exten
> d ")))->google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(((const
> std::string&)
>
> (+(+field)->google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorProto::extendee()))))->google::prot
> obuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(((const char*)" {
> ")))->google::protobuf:
> :internal::LogMessage::operator<<(((const
> std::string&)(+(+field)->google::proto
>
> buf::FieldDescriptorProto::name()))))->google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::o
> perator<<(((const char*)" = ")) <<
> (+field)->google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorPr
> oto::number()'
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:584: note: candidates are:
> google::protobuf::in
> ternal::LogMessage&
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(const std
> ::string&) <near match>
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:585: note:
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMess
> age& google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(const char*) <near
> match
> >
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:586: note:
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMess
> age& google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(char)
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:587: note:
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMess
> age& google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(int)
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:588: note:
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMess
> age&
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(google::protobuf::uint)
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:589: note:
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMess
> age& google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(double)
> google/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc: In member function `bool
> google::protobu
> f::SimpleDescriptorDatabase::DescriptorIndex<Value>::AddExtension(const
> google::
> protobuf::FieldDescriptorProto&, Value) [with Value = std::pair<const
> void*, int
> >]':
> google/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc:75: instantiated from `bool
> google::pro
> tobuf::SimpleDescriptorDatabase::DescriptorIndex<Value>::AddFile(const
> google::p
> rotobuf::FileDescriptorProto&, Value) [with Value = std::pair<const void*,
> int>]
> '
> google/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc:311: instantiated from here
> google/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc:159: error: ambiguous overload for
> 'opera
> tor<<' in '(+(+(+(+(&LogMessage( LOGLEVEL_ERROR, ((const
> char*)"google/protobuf/
> descriptor_database.cc"),
> 159))->google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operato
> r<<(((const char*)"Extension conflicts with extension already in database:
> exten
> d ")))->google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(((const
> std::string&)
>
> (+(+field)->google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorProto::extendee()))))->google::prot
> obuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(((const char*)" {
> ")))->google::protobuf:
> :internal::LogMessage::operator<<(((const
> std::string&)(+(+field)->google::proto
>
> buf::FieldDescriptorProto::name()))))->google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::o
> perator<<(((const char*)" = ")) <<
> (+field)->google::protobuf::FieldDescriptorPr
> oto::number()'
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:584: note: candidates are:
> google::protobuf::in
> ternal::LogMessage&
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(const std
> ::string&) <near match>
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:585: note:
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMess
> age& google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(const char*) <near
> match
> >
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:586: note:
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMess
> age& google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(char)
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:587: note:
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMess
> age& google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(int)
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:588: note:
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMess
> age&
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(google::protobuf::uint)
> ./google/protobuf/stubs/common.h:589: note:
> google::protobuf::internal::LogMess
> age& google::protobuf::internal::LogMessage::operator<<(double)
> make[2]: *** [descriptor_database.lo] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/d/JavaFT/protobuf-2.1.0rc1/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/d/JavaFT/protobuf-2.1.0rc1'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> > On cygwin you should really use the provided configure script and
> > makefiles. Once you've installed the library you can use your IDE for
> your
> > own project that uses protocol buffers.
> >
> > If you really want to compile with an IDE, then you will at least have to
> > run the configure script to produce config.h, which is included by other
> > protobuf headers. Note that you should NOT try to force the protobuf
> code
> > to use windows.h or any of the _WIN32 stuff. The whole point of Cygwin
> is
> > to provide a POSIX-like API on top of Windows, so you should let
> libprotobuf
> > use that API instead of using Win32 directly.
> >
> > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Alexey Yakubovich <alexe...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Is it possible at all (and how) to run gtest_main on Windows?
> >>
> >> I try to build PB on java and on C++. Java is OK.
> >>
> >> On C++, I use NetBeans 6.5.1 C++ with cygwin. After fixing some things I
> >> managed to compile whole project, with tests. Major innovation (I hope
> >> not breaking PB ?), I just commented out stuff in common.cc, forsing
> usage
> >> of windows.h, like this:
> >>
> >> //#ifdef _WIN32
> >> //#define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN // We only need minimal includes
> >> #include <windows.h>
> >> //#elif defined(HAVE_PTHREAD)
> >> //#include <pthread.h>
> >> //#else
> >> //#error "No suitable threading library available."
> >> //#endif
> >>
> >> (I tried to define _WIN32, but then it does not compile)
> >>
> >> But when run, I have
> >>
> >> D:\Proj\NB65_CPP\PB_C3\dist\Debug\Cygwin-Windows>pb_c3.exe
> >> 14871 [main] pb_c3 4204 _cygtls::handle_exceptions: Exception:
> >> STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION
> >> 16789 [main] pb_c3 4204 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to
> >> pb_c3.exe.stackdump
> >>
> >> (pb_c3.exe in my home-built PB)
> >>
> >> Or should is it better for PB C++/Windows to use scripts configure make
> >> make check etc.supplyed with PB distribution, not moving stuff to my
> >> convenient IDE?
> >>
> >> And what is the simplest possible argv for gtest_main?
> >>
> >> Thanks for any help / sharing know how
> >>
> >> Alexey
> >> > >>
> >
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
