Crystal clear. We are migrating existing code implemented with xmlbeans and it
does have this feature via the static XmlObject.Factory.parse() method.
Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: Kenton Varda
To: luis.gasc...@gmail.com
Cc: Protocol Buffers
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: Getting a Builder from full type name
There is not a built-in way to do this. I recommend creating a registry
object -- similar to ExtensionRegistry -- in which you can register all the
types you need to handle. Then you can register the types in high-level code
and pass that down to the RPC system, which itself then won't need to know what
types it is handling.
Note that every message type has a "default instance" which can also serve as
a factory for the type. So basically, your registry will just be a Map<String,
Message>, where the messages are the default instances that you get from
calling MessageType.getDefaultInstance(). You can call
defaultInstance.newBuilderForType() to create a new builder.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:10 AM, <luis.gasc...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I am using PB as a payload for AMQP messages. The same queue will get
different types of PB Messages. Right now, I am using the "type" AMQP
header field to write the full name of the message as returned by
msg.getDescriptorForType().getFullName().
Is there any way get a Builder from getFullName(), so that I can parse
all diferrent PB Messages using a single queue ?
Thanks
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
