Yes. In C++ the protocol compiler will generate a service interface and a stub implementation when given a .proto file containing a service definition. This is equivalent to what Python's service_reflection module does. But this is not an RPC implementation. You still have to add your own networking layer.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 9:26 AM, rthompson.dtisoft....@gmail.com < rthompson.dtisoft....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there a C++ equivalent to > > > http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/python/google.protobuf-module.html > ? > > which is used to create protocol service and service stub classes from > ServiceDescriptor objects at runtime. > > On Jun 29, 3:56 pm, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote: > > Protocol Buffers does not include an RPC implementation, only abstract > > interfaces for one. ServiceDescriptor is useful for implementing your > own > > RPC system on top of protocol buffers -- it allows you to define your > > services directly in the .proto file even though protocol buffers itself > > does not provide RPC. > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:15 AM, rthompson.dtisoft....@gmail.com < > > > > > > > > rthompson.dtisoft....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > What can you do with a ServiceDescriptor? Is there a > > > DynamicServiceFactory similar to the DynamicMessageFactory where you > > > can instantiate a service when all you have is a ServiceDescriptor, or > > > some other equivalent way of doing it? > > > > > Thanks! > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
