As the comment says, the first call will always occur at startup time when
there is only one thread anyway, so it's perfectly safe.  The parenthetical
about GCC4 is just an aside.

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Rizzuto, Raymond <raymond.rizz...@sig.com>wrote:

>  I am a bit nervous about the GCC4 comment in
> GeneratedMessageFactory::singleton  (message.cc):
>
>
>
>   // No need for thread-safety here because this will be called at static
>
>   // initialization time.  (And GCC4 makes this thread-safe anyway.)
>
>
>
> I’m using gcc 3.3.3.
>
>
>
> The singleton object in GeneratedMessageFactory::singleton, is a local
> static of non-POD type.  The C++ standard says:
>
>
>
> An implementation is permitted to perform
>
> early initialization of other local objects with static storage duration
> under the same conditions that an
>
> implementation is permitted to statically initialize an object with static
> storage duration in namespace scope
>
> (3.6.2). Otherwise such an object is initialized the first time control
> passes through its declaration; such an
>
> object is considered initialized upon the completion of its initialization.
>
>
>
> I don’t think the language standard addresses what “first time control
> passes through its declaration” means when two threads call the function
> simultaneously.  Perhaps gcc4 provides features that make that safe.  I
> don’t know if that is something that can be relied on in all compilers,
> however.
>
>
>
> Ray
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Kenton Varda [mailto:ken...@google.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 09, 2009 5:08 PM
>
> *To:* Rizzuto, Raymond
> *Cc:* protobuf@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: intermittent issue with encode (version 2.0.3)
>
>
>
> I suppose you could also temporarily edit the header file.
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Rizzuto, Raymond <raymond.rizz...@sig.com>
> wrote:
>
> I’m trying to, without success.   Breakpoints in header files, at least
> with the version of tools I have, don’t work very well.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Kenton Varda [mailto:ken...@google.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 09, 2009 5:02 PM
> *To:* Rizzuto, Raymond
> *Cc:* protobuf@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: intermittent issue with encode (version 2.0.3)
>
>
>
> Run in a debugger and set a breakpoint at wire_format_inl.h:289.
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Rizzuto, Raymond <raymond.rizz...@sig.com>
> wrote:
>
> I think I have an error in my code (C++) that only occurs when I have
> multiple threads, and a lot of message volume.   Even then, I can run the
> same test many times, but only get a failure on some runs.  With 7 threads
> running on a 4 core machine, and generating 480384 google protocol buffer
> messages, I get 33 errors like this to stdout:
>
>
>
> libprotobuf ERROR
> /siglinux/tc/sles9sp4_gcc-3.3.3_i686/sig1/protobuf-2.0.3/include/google/protobuf/wire_format_inl.h:289]
> Encountered string containing invalid UTF-8 data while serializing protocol
> buffer. Strings must contain only UTF-8; use the 'bytes' type for raw bytes.
>
>
>
> I believe that the data is in error since I get similar errors decoding the
> messages:
>
>
>
> libprotobuf ERROR
> /siglinux/tc/sles9sp4_gcc-3.3.3_i686/sig1/protobuf-2.0.3/include/google/protobuf/wire_format_inl.h:138]
> Encountered string containing invalid UTF-8 data while parsing protocol
> buffer. Strings must contain only UTF-8; use the 'bytes' type for raw bytes.
>
>
>
> Is there any way that I can check for this at run time so that I can print
> out more context?  I do call IsInitialized before serializing, but that
> doesn’t check for this case.
>
>
>
> I am running on SLES9SP4, using gcc 3.3.3 as the compiler.
>
>
>
> Ray
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> Ray Rizzuto
>
> raymond.rizz...@sig.com
>
> Susquehanna International Group
>
> (610)747-2336 (W)
>
> (215)776-3780 (C)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments
> is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
> sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its
> attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of
> this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly
> prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should
> be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any
> security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her
> employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to
> the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or
> that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments
> is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
> sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its
> attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of
> this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly
> prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should
> be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any
> security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her
> employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to
> the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or
> that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments
> is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
> sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its
> attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of
> this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly
> prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should
> be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any
> security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her
> employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to
> the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or
> that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to