On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Jon Skeet <sk...@pobox.com> wrote: > Out of interest Kenton, does this make the bootstrapping code simpler? > I'd imagine that can be built with just a "lite" version. It would be > nice to get rid of some of the nastiness that's involved in C# just to > get the PB-specific types to work :)
In theory, descriptor.proto could become "lite", and this might simplify bootstrapping. In practice, though, we actually use "heavy" features on the types in descriptor.proto, which is part of the reason why bootstrapping is so complicated. So, no, I don't think that would work. > > > Jon > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
