The problem with these spec files is that they're large and complicated and I just don't have time to learn how they work and maintain them. If someone would like to commit to maintaining these things -- which means I'd call on you to update them for each release, answer questions about them, etc., and I'd need you to respond promptly (within a day or two) -- then we could add them to the official package. Otherwise I'd prefer to stick with the current decentralized approach. BTW, Kevin, I'm confused about this line in your changelog:
> - Add -lpthread option to environment (else configure set it to -pthread) -pthread is the correct option, and it implies -lpthread. -pthread ensures that the C runtime library uses thread-safe functions (e.g. errno becomes thread-local) whereas -lpthread merely links against libpthread.so. Why did you change this? On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Kevin Deldycke <ke...@deldycke.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:18, Kev<ke...@deldycke.com> wrote: > > And tonight I've managed to upgrade it, so you can find a RPM of > > Protocol Buffers 2.2.0 for Mandriva 2009.1 in my repository: > > http://kev.coolcavemen.com/static/repository/mandriva/2009.1/x86_64/ > > Oh, and FYI, please find attached my spec file. If you find strange or > bad things in it, please tell me, I'm far from being proficient in > C++... :] > > -- > Kevin Deldycke > • blog: http://kevin.deldycke.com > • band: http://coolcavemen.com > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
