So, his implementation is a little bit faster in two of the benchmarks, and impossibly faster in the other one. I don't really believe that it's possible to improve parsing time by as much as he claims, except by doing something like lazy parsing, which would just be deferring the work to later on. Would have been nice if he'd contributed his optimizations back to the official implementation rather than write a whole new one...
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:38 AM, ijuma <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > I ran across the following and thought it may be of interest to this > list: > > > http://hiramchirino.com/blog/2009/09/activemq-protobuf-implementation-rocks.html > > Best, > Ismael > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
