You'd have to ask the Android people, as they are the owners of this
alternate implementation.  IIRC, they have not released the code generator
program to go with it, so you probably won't be able to use it.

The official protobuf implementation in "lite mode" should work great on
Android -- this is exactly the use case lite-mode was created for.  Add the
following to your .proto file in order to use lite mode:
  option optimize_for = LITE_RUNTIME;

So I'd recommend using the official implementation, but again I know almost
nothing about Android's implementation so it's hard for me to make an
informed recommendation.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:36 PM, rahul prasad <rahu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So, If I am developing for Android, should I use this protobuf library
> instead of the standard implementation present at com.google.protobuf? Will
> I encounter any problems mid way due to this switch? Any feedback would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Rahul
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Henner Zeller <h.zel...@acm.org> wrote:
>
>> Seems to be part of Android
>>
>> http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=com.google.common.io.protocol.ProtoBuf
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:36, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:28 AM, rahul prasad <rahu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >> May i ask whats the difference between these two protobuf
>> implementations?
>> >> com.google.common.io.protocol.ProtoBuf.java
>> >
>> > I've never heard of this.  Where does it come from?
>> >
>> >>
>> >> com.google.protobuf package classes
>> >
>> > This is the official implementation.
>> > >> >
>> >
>>
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to