The work is going slowly because the Python C extension API has lots of
subtle quirks.  The good news is that Google has Python implementation
experts who are reviewing the code.  But this is "20% work" for everyone
involved (i.e. not their real jobs) so it will take awhile.

My hope is that we'll be able to release it in a couple months.

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:28 AM, achepikau <achepi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, Kenton
>
> I am using Python Protobuffers library as exchange format between game
> client (C++ Windows application) and game server (Python socket server
> based on Twisted framework).
> After upgrade from 2.0.1 to 2.3.0 we got 4x-6x performance boost
> (python 2.5.2, Ubuntu 8.04) - it's great!
> Do you know about Petar's timeline for the new version with more power
> for Python code?
>
> On Jan 20, 10:45 pm, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> > In 2.3.0, the Python implementation is now 10x-25x faster than it used to
> > be.  However, as the implementation is pure-python, it is still much
> slower
> > than C++.  Petar (author of much of the Python code) is currently working
> on
> > a version of the Python implementation which wraps the C++ library in the
> > hope of improving this further.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Baruch Oxman <baruch.ox...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi !
> >
> > > I'm interested in using Protocol buffers for serialization of data
> > > passed between Python and C++ processes.
> > > I've seen some posts on performance comparison of different python
> > > serializes, saying that the performance of google protocols
> > > implementation for python is much worse than in C++.
> >
> > > Was any work done on this recently to improve the performance on
> > > python ?
> > > Is such work planned in the future ?
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "Protocol Buffers" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> <protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com<protobuf%252bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> >
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Protocol Buffers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.

Reply via email to