There is no explicit support for this. You can, of course, just use an integer instead.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:10 AM, sabretoothedhamster < sabretoothedhams...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Is there any way to extend not only a message, but an enum also? E.g. > having the example from > http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/techniques.html > I would like to keep OneMessage description separated into two files. > Core part with Foo and Bar descriptions in one .proto file (like in > the second pre section), and the second .proto file with Baz > description. It is clear how to organize this on a message level, but > I would like also to have enum Type { FOO = 1; BAR = 2; } in the first > file, and enum Type { BAZ = 3; } in the second. Is it possible at all? > Any workarounds? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<protobuf%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
