The code shown uses XmlSerializer - it doesn't use protobuf-net at all.
protobuf-net does tend to be friendly towards this, however you would:
- deserialize with protobuf-net into objects
- serialize with XmlSerializer
The only point of co tact between the two is the object model in the middle.
On 24 Jun 2011, at 16:29, Lars Schouw <sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, for example in C# you can do like this to create an XPathDocument using
> the protobuf-net lib.
>
> public static XPathDocument Serialize(ProtocolBufferMesage msg)
> {
> XPathDocument xmlDoc = null;
> Serializer.PrepareSerializer<Test>();
>
> XmlSerializer x = new XmlSerializer(msg.GetType());
> using (MemoryStream memoryStream = new MemoryStream())
> {
> using (TextWriter w = new StreamWriter(memoryStream))
> {
> x.Serialize(w, msg);
> memoryStream.Position = 0;
> xmlDoc = new XPathDocument(memoryStream);c
> }
> }
> return xmlDoc;
> }
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Protocol Buffers" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/protobuf/-/E_KNwOPbenoJ.
> To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
