Updates:
Summary: Support ByteBuffer in CodedInputStream and CodedOutputStream to
avoid redundant copies for direct ByteBuffer.
Status: New
Labels: -Type-Defect -Priority-Medium Type-Enhancement Priority-Low
Comment #2 on issue 429 by xiaof...@google.com: Support ByteBuffer in
CodedInputStream and CodedOutputStream to avoid redundant copies for direct
ByteBuffer.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=429
Reopened this issue and changed the title to be more specific. The
interface of messages and builders is already fixed and shouldn't be
changed easily. Adding ByteBuffer support in CodedInputStream and
CodedOutputStream should be good enough to support direct ByteBuffers
efficiently.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
