There is nothing UB the specification to enforce that. You would have to
use your own checks.
On 11 Jun 2013 01:55, "oxlc" <li.c...@openx.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Through some quick searching I couldn't find any discussion about
> specifying a repeated field that must have at least one of them in a
> message. Did that need ever come up for you? Do most of you deal with this
> on the application level so far? If this was discussed before, sorry about
> the spam and please point me to the thread.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Protocol Buffers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to