On 7 October 2013 10:45, Barzo <dba...@gmail.com> wrote: > In a meanwhile I have built the .cs generated file into a separate DLL > assembly and I added it (linked) to my C++/CLI project.
Indeed, compiling it as C# and referencing/linking was what I meant - i.e. using the C# *from* C++/CLI, rather than *in* C++/CLI If you wanted native C++/CLI output, you'd need to write a new code-generator for C++/CLI and the desired library. Which isn't necessarily too difficult (in the case of protobuf-net, you should be able to use csharp.xslt as a starting point). Re the difference between protobuf-csharp-port vs protobuf-net: - protobuf-csharp-port tries to be idiomatic protobuf, supporting C# - protobuf-net tries to be idiomatic C# (/.NET), supporting protobuf Or in other words: the API for protobuf-csharp-port is very similar to the google implementations - and virtually identical to the protobuf java API - builder pattern, etc. Conversely, protobuf-net aims first and foremost to be a .NET serializer (mutable objects, primarily code-first (code-gen added as a secondary tool), etc), but just happening to dealing with protobuf data. Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
