On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:05 PM Tomáš Volf <volf.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are thinking about switching to newer protocol buffer (current 3.5.1) > but keeping on using proto2 syntax. Under this condition (proto2), does > library created using 3.5.1 generate compatible messages with one compiled > using 2.6.1? > If you are talking about the wire format, yes, proto 3.5.1 is fully compatible with 2.6.1. If you are using the same .proto file, they should generate exactly the same wire format data given the same proto message. > > From what I understand it should but I want to make sure. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
