It seems that by using field numbers instead, changing a field name would not be a breaking change.
So instead of `foo.bar.buzz` we could do something like `2.1.4`. rel: https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/master/src/google/protobuf/field_mask.proto -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/protobuf/3e08e634-d5a3-4751-a8df-a85f697facdan%40googlegroups.com.
