[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526354#comment-13526354
]
Philip Harvey commented on PROTON-136:
--------------------------------------
Hi Ken,
I like your suggestion to change pn_ssl_new to accept an optional state object,
i.e.
pn_ssl_t *pn_ssl_new( pn_ssl_domain_t *, pn_transport_t *, pn_ssl_state_t *);
I've nearly finished implementing the Java changes for this and will send you a
proposed patch in the next hour or two. This will contain the necessary Java
and ssl.py changes, plus a couple of minor tweaks to the proton-c proton.py
file. I haven't touched the C code.
I propose one minor change to the API. Since the Java SSL state object is just
storing a hostname and port, calling it "SSLState" in the Python wrapper
doesn't feel right to me. How about SSLSessionDetails instead? For me, this
name is a reasonable description, whether you're using C or Java under the
covers.
> Add support for SSL session resumption
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: PROTON-136
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-136
> Project: Qpid Proton
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: proton-c
> Affects Versions: 0.3
> Reporter: Affan Dar
> Assignee: Ken Giusti
> Labels: ssl, sslContext, sslresume
>
> Open SSL supports resumption of SSL sessions which by-pass the heavy SSL
> handshake process. This is critical for scenarios involving low powered
> devices especially on cellular data networks where bandwidth is precious.
> It would be great if Proton exposes this ssl resume feature to users. .
> From: rhs [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 11:34 AM
> To: Affan Dar
> Cc: David Ingham
> Subject: Re: SSL session resumption
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Affan Dar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>Serializing/restoring the whole session state for the messenger will work
> >>for the scenario I think.
> Ok, let's start with this step then. I'm open to providing something finer
> grained if there is a need, but my preference is to keep it simple for the
> moment.
>
> >>One more thing, RFC 5077 has another flavor of session resumption which
> >>openssl supports (original >>implemented as RFC 4057 back in 2007 I think).
> >>This allows us to resume sessions without carrying state >>on the server
> >>side which as you can imagine is a big deal for service vendors. Probably
> >>there is no API >>level impact if messenger handles the session state
> >>itself but just wanted to put this on your radar.
> Ok, good to know.
> Could one of you file a JIRA for this upstream? I'm trying to get things a
> little more organized on the process front and keep everything centralized in
> JIRA. ;-)
> --Rafael
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
