+1 Rajith
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > I'm +1 on docs. It would be consistent with examples, tests, and tools. > > --Rafael > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Phil Harvey <p...@philharveyonline.com>wrote: > >> I'm happy with the location although to increase consistency with other >> projects I have a mild preference for either "docs" or "doc". The former >> seems to be the most common in other open source projects, and the latter >> is the name used by Qpid. >> >> Phil >> >> >> On 4 March 2013 19:53, Michael Goulish <mgoul...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> > I'm planning to start checking my docs into the proton tree soon. >> > I was assuming I would just put them at top level, i.e. >> > >> > qpid-proton/documentation >> > >> > Anybody care to agree, object, counter-offer, praise, complain, argue, >> > question, or muse ? >> > >> > >>
