On May 14, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Clebert Suconic <csuco...@redhat.com>wrote: > >> I was just playing with possibilities and trying to find ways to improve >> the API how things are done. >> >> >> >>> The interface is designed to >>> operate in terms of chunks of message data rather than in terms of an >>> entire message. >> >> >> >> That's one thing that I'm lacking control through the API actually.. which >> I'm looking to improve. >> >> >> My application (hornetQ) has the ability to store messages on the disk and >> send in chunks to the server. >> >> Using the current API, I would have to parse the entire message to Proton, >> and have proton dealing with the chunks. >> > > I'm not sure I follow this. The byte[] that you pass to send doesn't need > to be a complete message. I thought the Delivery had to be complete. If that's not the case then ignore me :) I will research a bit more here....something is probably missing for our large message implementation.. but let me reserach a bit more and I will come back on this when it's time. I won't be sending the setPayload to be committed or work on fixing it to a commit level... I will forget this one for now.. I just wanted to give a food for thought that having the messages encoded directly could be a good idea.
