[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14653416#comment-14653416
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-964:
---------------------------------------
Github user gemmellr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/48#discussion_r36174549
--- Diff:
proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/engine/impl/EventImpl.java ---
@@ -217,6 +101,19 @@ public void dispatch(Handler handler)
dispatch(children.next());
}
}
+
+ @Override
+ public void redispatch(EventType as_type, Handler handler) throws
HandlerException
--- End diff --
A little unclear why this is needed, but ignoring that...it seems like
using it inside a handler (as in the test) would lead to 'redispatch' to the
current and child handlers before the original event is then subsequently given
to any child handlers. Expected? Worth documenting?
> Proton-J extensible event types
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: PROTON-964
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-964
> Project: Qpid Proton
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: proton-j
> Affects Versions: 0.10
> Reporter: Bozo Dragojevic
> Assignee: Bozo Dragojevic
> Fix For: 0.11
>
>
> Event.Type is an enum which makes it impossible to extend.
> Introduce a separate interface EventType and make Event.Type implement it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
