[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robbie Gemmell reopened PROTON-1096:
------------------------------------

Reopening.

While I was expanding the changes proposed in the PR to cover received 
Deliveries as well, I changed the method signatures from using int to using 
long so that the 32bit message format would be represented using positive long 
values only. I have since come to find this causes runtime but not compile time 
compatibility issues for some of the things out there already using the 
existing method, so given that I think reverting to use of int as originally 
present/proposed would be prudent given the limited real world benefit of the 
alternative.

> [proton-j] enable set/get of MessageFormat on the Delivery being 
> sent/received 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PROTON-1096
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1096
>             Project: Qpid Proton
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: proton-j
>    Affects Versions: 0.12.0
>            Reporter: Sreeram Garlapati
>            Assignee: Robbie Gemmell
>             Fix For: 0.12.0
>
>   Original Estimate: 4h
>  Remaining Estimate: 4h
>
> This is a feature request from windows azure eventhubs team. Here's the pull 
> request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/53
> I (sreeram, from windows azure eventHubs team) am building eventHubs Java 
> client SDK and taking a dependency on proton-j (which will be available on 
> GitHub, hopefully, soon) for Amqp.
> EventHubs amqp client will need to set a Custom MessageFormat to enable a 
> Critical scenario for Sending (Send Batch) messages to EventHubs from our 
> JavaClient.
> Delivery class, currently, already has a getMessageFormat().. I extended this 
> to also have setMessageFormat() method which should be copied to the Transfer 
> frame.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to