Hi Andrew, Thanks for the pointer! Unfortunately this doesn't work, I'll see if we can include a newer version of GCC in our build chain.
Alexandre On jeu., 2016-02-18 at 13:27 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 10:51 +0000, TRUFANOW Alexandre wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am attempting to compile proton and the C++ binding using GCC 3.4 > > This is a very old compiler (from no later than 2006), and we don't > test on it (although we are striving currently to support C++03). > > Going forward it is not too unlikely that we will move to using C++11 > features for our implementation. So if you can use a more recent > version of gcc (or clang) then you will be better off. > > > > and > > get the following error when compiling the C++ bindings. (compiler > > flags > > have been removed in proton-c/CMakeLists.txt: -pedantic-errors > > -Wno-variadic-macros) > > > > > [ 33%] Building CXX object proton-c/bindings/cpp/CMakeFiles/qpid- > > > proton-cpp.dir/src/acceptor.cpp.o > > > In file included from /tmp/qpid-proton-0.12.0/proton- > > > c/bindings/cpp/src/contexts.hpp:28, > > > from /tmp/qpid-proton-0.12.0/proton- > > > c/bindings/cpp/src/acceptor.cpp:26: > > > /tmp/qpid-proton-0.12.0/proton- > > > c/bindings/cpp/include/proton/container.hpp:129: error: declaration > > > of `void proton::container::link_options(const > > > proton::link_options&)' > > > /tmp/qpid-proton-0.12.0/proton- > > > c/bindings/cpp/include/proton/link_options.hpp:60: error: changes > > > meaning of `link_options' from `class proton::link_options' > > > make[2]: *** [proton-c/bindings/cpp/CMakeFiles/qpid-proton- > > > cpp.dir/src/acceptor.cpp.o] Error 1 > > > make[1]: *** [proton-c/bindings/cpp/CMakeFiles/qpid-proton- > > > cpp.dir/all] Error 2 > > > > From what I understand, this is due to a clash between the class > > proton::link_options and the method proton::container::link_options > > which cannot have the same name. > > As far as I can tell (and the compilers we test on seem to agree) there > is no name clash here (it is probably a name lookup bug in the > compiler)! > > You could try explicitly making the declaration: > > void link_options(const proton::link_options&); > > But I doubt this will help, as the compiler seems to know this already > and the name is not ambiguous. > > HTH > > Andrew > > > ******************************* This e-mail contains information for the intended recipient only. It may contain proprietary material or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you are not authorised to distribute, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment to it. Murex cannot guarantee that it is virus free and accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from its use. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify immediately the sender and delete the original email received, any attachments and all copies from your system.
