I'm not saying we should do that, but can't we just wrap it HTMLElement.prototype too ?
Tobie On Aug 24, 6:49 am, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > ... this difference may cause some > > bugs, so I suggest a small wrapper for getElementsByClassName in > > firefox3.0 > > This is just a wrapper for document.gEBCN, but don't forget that the method > itself is available on every node in the DOM. We can't wrap them all, > therefore we mustn't wrap the document method either. > > I suggest leaving everything as-is and simply mixing Enumerable methods in > NodeList.prototype (if it doesn't already inherit them from Array). And as > for the dynamic nature of the nodeList, I wouldn't worry too much; most > users use the collection immediately after the gEBCN call. If that is not > the case, the user is always free to wrap the method call in $A(). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
