Perhaps you intend it, but you're assuming both nodes exist in a DOM
fragment (and are not the root node of the fragment).
I realize this scenario may be best handled by the developer's use of
Element.replace instead, but perhaps some error checking will help
avoid confusion.
TAG
On Sep 23, 2008, at 5:13 AM, Diego Perini wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I was reading in some LightHouse comments about the new swap method on
> elements and was wondering if the following is interesting for that
> matter. I had it written this way in my simple code:
>
> // nodes to swap (t)arget node, (s)econdary node
> swapNodes:
> function(t, s) {
> var n = t.nextSibling, p = t.parentNode;
> s.parentNode.replaceChild(t, s);
> p.insertBefore(s, n);
> }
>
> so I transformed that in to the suggested prototype syntax (kangax):
>
> Element.addMethods({
> swapWith: function(element, other) {
> element = $(element);
> other = $(other);
> if (element !== other) {
> var node = element.nextSibling, parent = element.parentNode;
> other.parentNode.replaceChild(element, other);
> parent.insertBefore(other, node);
> }
> return element;
> }
> });
>
> Haven't done any test on this, but the above simpler syntax works well
> for me.
>
> --
> Diego Perini
>
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
