2009/3/15 Tobie Langel <tobie.lan...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I wonder why Caja is taken in so much more consideration than a
>> practice that always existed in the programming world.
>
> There's two reasons to that:
>
> 1. I've been consulting for Google Caja team to make Prototype Caja-
> compliant,
> 2. Valija[1], the language which was created by the Google Caja team
> as a result of that work[2], is an approximate subset of the ES3.1
> strict mode, so supporting it today means supporting strict mode
> tomorrow.
>
> Best,
>
> Tobie
>
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/google-caja/wiki/WhatsMissing
> [2]
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-caja-discuss/browse_thread/thread/284935fa0784316d/31e476a985ae8c66?lnk=gst#31e476a985ae8c66
> >
>
Is there any evidence that NOT being strict is slower for a non-strict
environment?
Does missing a few {} or the odd ; in allowable places make the parser
have more work to do?
--
-----
Richard Quadling
Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
"Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
