Being serious for a moment, it sounds like we're all happy (enough)
with Function.empty.
Can't say I *like* Function.identity (I'd prefer "Function.passBack")
but it at least is readily defensible as being derived from
mathematics (like curry) and there are several "yea" vote for it in
this thread.
-- T.J. :-)
On Sep 29, 8:58 am, Jim Higson <j...@wikizzle.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 September 2009 06:49:15 Joran Greef wrote:
>
> > Prototype's existing String.empty and Array.empty interfaces would
> > imply that Function.empty return a boolean indicating perhaps that the
> > function is empty.
>
> Well, it *could* do:
>
> Function.empty = function(){};
> Function.empty.empty = function(){return true};
>
> Of course this doesn't cover other empty functions and I may be not entirely
> serious ;-)
>
> Jim
>
> --
> Jim
> my wiki ajaxification thing:http://wikizzle.org
> my blog:http://jimhigson.blogspot.com/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
