+1,000,000,000 (cycles) -1 on downplaying really nerdy optimizations :)
you curmudgeon you (nice word, btw) --- Warm Regards, Ryan Gahl On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Bob Kerns <r...@acm.org> wrote: > Not to be a curmudgeon about it -- I'll just point out that the CPU cycles > consumed in processing the email for this discussion far exceeds the CPU > cycles saved by all the code the lot of you will ever write with such > tweaks. > > Purely entertainment / mental game play. > > If you want to improve performance, the mental effort would be better spent > looking at your algorithm, or even better, measuring the performance to find > where you need to focus your attention. I can tell you now it won't be your > choice of iteration statements! > > Play on -- I just wanted to put it into context... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Prototype: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
