Ah right, yes that makes perfect sense.
What if the date were to be serialized as "new Date(...)"?
For example,
var input = new String("{ dob:new Date(1220453756681+0100) }");
var evaluated = input.evalJSON();
var v1 = evaluated.dob.toString();
// v1 ==> "Wed Sep 03 2008 15:55:56 GMT+0100 (GMT Daylight Time)"
var v2 = evaluated.dob.getDay();
// v2 ==> 3
Would there be any nasty pitfalls with this approach?
Lea Hayes
On Sep 11, 7:26 pm, Walter Lee Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2008, at 2:02 PM, T.J. Crowder wrote:
>
> > We probably don't want the JSON deserializer to look at
> > every string value and make it a date if it happens to look like
> > one... :-)
>
> Right, cuz then it would be like a phone number on MobileSafari.
>
> Walter
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
