Has that been tested with deferral?
Ryan Gahl CEO Nth Penguin, LLC http://www.nthpenguin.com -- Inquire: 1-920-574-2218 Blog: http://www.someElement.com LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryangahl On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Tobie Langel <tobie.lan...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Actually, Robert, I took a closer look at your implementation. > > And I figured out why it's so much faster. > > You're relying on a single array of partially applied arguments whose > length you reset rather than cloning the array each time. > > This actually turns out to be perfectly spec-compliant and avoids > significant memory consumption (one arg array instantiation upon > binding instead of one per call to the bound function). > > I must admit this looks both very appealing... and scary at the same > time. > > Thoughts anyone ? > > Best, > > Tobie > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
