Hi Mikey,

> In this case, I'm just requesting a static, plain-text file.  As such,
> it contains no headers as an HTML response would.

Not HTML headers, HTTP headers.  Every HTTP response has headers,
regardless of the resource being requested.  Your web server does this
for you.  Say we have a file "testing.txt" with the contents "This is
a test.".  Here's what an HTTP/1.1 response to a request for that file
might typically look like this (I've shortened the server header's
value):

* * * *
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:08:33 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.4 (Linux/SUSE) ...
Last-Modified: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:33:43 GMT
ETag: "1ae416f-1aac-877147c0"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 15
Content-Type: text/plain

This is a test.
* * * *

(Also on Pastie at http://pastie.org/445728 -- Google Groups tends to
insert blank lines at random, and blank lines are significant in this
snippet.)  Everything after the 200 line until the blank line is a
header; the blank line indicates the headers are complete and the
resource data follows.  Details in the spec[1].  In your case, you're
looking to make sure the Content-Type header[2] is correct.  Firebug
[3] will show you the headers associated with a response on its Net
tab.

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-14.17
[3] http://getfirebug.com

HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available

On Apr 13, 8:06 pm, MikeyLikesIt <etov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> T.J.,
>
> Thanks for the rapid response!
>
> In this case, I'm just requesting a static, plain-text file.  As such,
> it contains no headers as an HTML response would.  Additionally, the
> text in the response is never displayed by the browser; it's only
> parsed into an array of JSON objects.  Since this is a static file,
> should I just manually add a header to the file?  If so, do you know
> the syntax for the header?
>
> Thanks again!
>
> On Apr 13, 9:46 am, "T.J. Crowder" <t...@crowdersoftware.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey Mikey,
>
> > I think the issue isn't the request headers, but rather the response
> > headers.  Make sure your server is sending back the correct content
> > type.  Firefox will take the server's word for it in terms of what is
> > coming back (HTML, XML, JSON, etc.),.  For what you're doing, you
> > probably want the server to be sending back the type "text/plain".
> > How you do that depends on what kind of server software you're using.
>
> > HTH,
> > --
> > T.J. Crowder
> > tj / crowder software / com
> > Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
>
> > On Apr 13, 4:33 pm, MikeyLikesIt <etov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Howdy!
>
> > > I'm attempting to use the Ajax.Request object to grab a text file for
> > > parsing.  In this context, the file is a *.properties file that
> > > contains application constants that are parsed into properties and
> > > associated values.
>
> > > It works great, except for one, small problem with Mozilla.  Whenever
> > > the file is read, Mozilla generates a "not well formed" error, because
> > > it is expecting a well-formed HTML response.  This is probably working
> > > as intended, but is there a setting in the Ajax.Request object that
> > > will allow the browser to expect a plain-text response and not a well-
> > > formed HTML response?  I've played around with the requestHeaders
> > > option a bit, but that hasn't helped, unless I'm not getting it (which
> > > is quite possible).
>
> > > A snippet from my object is below, for reference.  Thanks in advance
> > > for the help!
>
> > > =================================================================
>
> > >         , getResponse: function() {
>
> > >                 var reader = this;
> > >                 new Ajax.Request(
> > >                         reader.FILE_PATH
> > >                         , {
> > >                                 method: 'get'
> > >                                 , onSuccess: function(transport) { 
> > > reader.parseResponse(transport,
> > > reader.properties); }
> > >                                 , onFailure: function() { alert('There 
> > > was an error processing
> > > this request.'); }
> > >                 });
> > >         }
>
> > >         , parseResponse: function(transport, propertiesArray) {
>
> > >                 var rawResponse = transport.responseText.split('\n');
> > >                 var reader = this;
>
> > >                 for(var i = 0; i < rawResponse.length; i++) {
> > >                         var line = rawResponse[i];
> > >                         var index = line.indexOf('=');
> > >                         if(index > -1) {
> > >                                 var property = {
> > >                                         name: line.substring(0, index)
> > >                                         , value: line.substring(index + 
> > > 1, line.length)
> > >                                 };
> > >                                 propertiesArray.push(property);
> > >                         }
> > >                 }
> > >         }
>
> > > =================================================================
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to