Thanks for your opinion. I think I will take the DOM approach as well.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Alex McAuley <
webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com> wrote:

> Some SEO experts will argue that google for example will mark you down for
> hidden content in a page as it may think you are trying to trick the search
> engine and some will argue that it doesnt matter.
>
> I personaly do not know which way is faster  but i prefer the Dom approach
> as it does not load any html until something triggers it to - which
> increases load time and doesnt put an element somewhere that amy be
> displayed for browsers that dont use css or javascript.
>
>
>
> Alex Mcauley
> http://www.thevacancymarket.com
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "kimbaudi" <kimba...@gmail.com>
> To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us" <
> prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 08, 2010 6:50 AM
> Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Question on performance and SEO optimization
> regarding javascript to create elements
>
>
>
>  Hi, I have come up with 2 ways to create a modal dialog. The first way
>> is to statically create the html with a style of display:none; and
>> using event handlers to show/hide the html.  The second way is to
>> dynamically create the html using Prototype (new Element(tagName[,
>> attributes]). Which way is "better"?  Is there an argument for using
>> one method over the other or does it really not matter? Thanks for
>> your opinion.
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<prototype-scriptaculous%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<prototype-scriptaculous%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

Reply via email to