Murata has all of their passive component data on their website:
http://ds.murata.co.jp/software/simsurfing/en-us/index.html

This includes:

S parameter files  (which show self resonant frequency)
Capacitance derating as a function of voltage (for capacitors)

I've found this to be a great resource.

-Chris



On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Doug Ausmus <daus...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I didn't see anyone bring this up, and I'm not sure which dielectrics and
> types are being used, and at risk of stating what is likely trivially
> obvious to the electronics designers in this august group <g>, but when
> using MLCC and going to smaller size capacitors (X5R and X7R, others) don't
> forget to re-check the dielectric voltage-dependence curves. For your chip
> film caps, this is far less an issue.
>
> Here is some info and references, just in case some of your
> non-electronics designers want to check it out:
>
> Although this article is testing with higher valued caps, here's a nice
> graph showing how the smaller chip sizes increase this effect over larger
> sizes:
> http://www.edn.com/design/analog/4402049/2/Temperature-
> and-voltage-variation-of-ceramic-capacitors--or-why-
> your-4-7--F-capacitor-becomes-a-0-33--F-capacitor
> (Figure 1 and Table 2)
> (From the following original article:)
> https://www.maximintegrated.com/en/app-notes/index.mvp/id/5527
>
> Most everyone is aware of the DC bias dielectric effects, but note that AC
> waveforms have some dielectric effects as well, but exert their effects in
> the opposite direction, to a point and are, of course, frequency dependent
> (I am not sure if these AC dielectric effects are also size-dependent or
> not, but it would be logical they might be):
> http://catalogs.avx.com/SurfaceMount.pdf
> (PDF page 128, [doc page #127]... Figures 2, 3)
>
> :-)
> Doug
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Andrew Greenberg <a...@ece.pdx.edu> wrote:
>
>> > Are there any places where we need to be concerned about wattage?
>>
>> Yep! There are two cases that we won't switch packages: one where
>> wattage is a problem (so far, no cases of this on the LGR board) and one
>> where the capacitance value is too high for an 0402 (anything greater
>> than about 1 uF). In these (and other cases I'm sure I missed) we'll
>> leave the larger packages. Other than that, the "jelly bean" parts can
>> be switched to 0402.
>>
>> OK, everyone seems to agree it's a "go", so now OreSat's default package
>> size is now 0402. I think this makes sense.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> Andrew Greenberg
>>
>> Electrical and Computer Engineering
>> Portland State University
>> http://www.ece.pdx.edu/
>> a...@ece.pdx.edu  C: 503.708.7711
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> psas-avionics mailing list
>> psas-avionics@lists.psas.pdx.edu
>> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-avionics
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> psas-avionics mailing list
> psas-avionics@lists.psas.pdx.edu
> http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-avionics
>
>
_______________________________________________
psas-avionics mailing list
psas-avionics@lists.psas.pdx.edu
http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-avionics

Reply via email to