John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:16:58PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The good news is I've recently got my hands on a x86_64 box. > > > > The bad news is that PSPP fails 40 out of 93 tests :( > > It's probably not hard to fix. Have you tried? > > I'm working on it. One of the problems is inappropriate use of size_t --- > more specifically, assuming that sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(int). > > IMHO size_t should only be used for things compatible with the sizeof() > operator. Not for measuring the number of items in an array, which much > of the PSPP code has done.
You'll have to give an example. size_t should be fine for counting items in an array. -- "In the PARTIES partition there is a small section called the BEER. Prior to turning control over to the PARTIES partition, the BIOS must measure the BEER area into PCR[5]." --TCPA PC Specific Implementation Specification _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
