John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK. I'll do that. Perhaps I could ask then that people hold off from > committing any major changes to CVS over the next few days; one line > changes are fine, but anything more than that perhaps should wait.
Okay. I have a big clean-up patch waiting in the wings, but I'm willing to keep it updated as needed. It's not ready for prime time yet. > Here are the major components of PSPP in my opinion: > > [:snip:] > > There are some minor points I disagree on, but I'll discuss them when > I understand them better. OK. > Definately. And there are a number of files (pool.c comes to mind) > that have test functions, and therefore depend upon the lexer and god knows > what else). The test functions need to be moved to seperate files. Ideally the tests would be independent enough that they could be compiled into a completely separate program, but that's often difficult because the code that they test has dependencies, and the code that it depends on has its own dependencies, and so on. I should probably work on that, but putting it in a separate file is a start. -- Ben Pfaff email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://benpfaff.org _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
