I'm beginning to wonder whether it would be better to check in the set of changes we have now. It has changed from being a brief "reorganization" to a major code cleanup. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it means that it becomes more difficult to coordinate. CVS isn't perfect but it does make it easier to coordinate changes.
We don't have to get the file names perfect yet. As long as a ChangeLog exists to explain what's been done (I assume you'll be adding your own ChangeLog entries before you check in), we can figure out what happened over a series of renames. Also I worry about becoming less transparent to outsiders. Anyone who looks at the CVS tree at the moment will think nothing much is going on. That's certainly not true. I dunno. What do you guys think? -- "The fact is, technical people are better off not looking at patents. If you don't know what they cover and where they are, you won't be knowingly infringing on them. If somebody sues you, you change the algorithm or you just hire a hit-man to whack the stupid git." --Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
