John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> From Jason's comments, I'm getting the idea that he's suggesting that
> we accept contributions in a GCC supported language, and link them
> into the PSPP code at the object level, thus avoiding the need to
> translate them into C.   That's certainly possible, but I rather doubt
> if it'll save any work.  

For what it's worth, it is pretty easy to link Java and C++ code
into C.  GCJ makes Java pretty palatable as a system software
development language.

But C is preferred.
-- 
"While the Melissa license is a bit unclear, Melissa aggressively
 encourages free distribution of its source code."
--Kevin Dalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

Reply via email to