John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:15:12PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > A better solution would be to detect that the data set has not > been changed by the syntax that we executed. In that case, we > don't need to re-encapsulate it in a new datasheet. > > Do what do we do if we decide that nothing has changed? We've already > called datasheet_make_reader, which has destroyed the datasheet. So > now we have to make another one. How do we do that?
It hasn't destroyed the datasheet. It just encapsulated it in a casereader. We could come up with a way to get it back. I don't know the best mechanism yet. It's on my list of things-to-think-about-soon (but below patch #6117, which I'm playing with now). -- A bicycle is one of the world's beautiful machines, beautiful machines are art, and art is civilisation, good living, and balm to the soul. --Elisa Francesca Roselli _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
