I agree that it's a good summary - neither too detailed nor too broad. On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:49:17PM +0800, John Darrington wrote: > I think this is a good summary of what we need. The only things I > would add are: > > * I would make item 4 a secondary goal. Anyone who runs a procedure > which creates a table larger than the memory of any modernish > machine has probably made a mistake.
I think I agree with this, depending on what we mean by the word "table". So how do you want to do it? -Jason _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
