On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 09:05:10AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Upon reflection, I think you must have meant merging in the other
direction: fixes from #1 merged into #2 and #3, and enhancements
from #2 merged into #3. That makes sense.??? Surely merging is a commutative operation? One starts with two streams of development and end up with only one which is the union of the first two. A \cup B \equiv B \cup A I don't see that it makes any sense to talk about the direction in which one merges. J' -- PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
