Follow-up Comment #4, patch #6829 (project pspp):
Under Hypothesis Testing:
>+or does the mean of a dataset significantly differ from a particular
I would write "whether" in place of "does", "differs" in place of "differ".
I notice that @footnote is not used in quite the right way in a few places.
In particular, there should be no space between the text and the @footnote
command; otherwise there is a space between the text and the footnote marker
in the output, which is not the usual style.
>+...@footnote{this example assumes that is it already proven that @var{B} is
>+not greater than @var{A}.}
Is this correct? I would have guessed that it assumes that it assumes that
it is *not* already proven. Regardless of whether I'm right about that, "is
it" => "it is".
As I continue to read through examples, I find myself wondering whether there
is value in inserting the @prompt{PSPP>} prefixes. Since these appear on
(almost) every line, they don't really teach the reader very much, and they
make it more difficult to cut-and-paste from the manual.
Now I have to leave off before reading the Linear Regression section.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?6829>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
