Sounds OK to me. On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 06:04:34AM +0000, John Darrington wrote: > Looking at recent bug reports (at [email protected] and on 3rd > party forums such as Debian) it seems that this issue is becoming > urgent. Unless anyone has any objections, I'm going to start a > Gtk+-2.18 branch so as to avoid falling too far behind on this > problem. > > J' > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:33:17PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> writes: > > I'll figure out how hard it would be to build GTK+ 2.18 for > > backports.org. If it's not too hard, then we could just advise > > users to update their GTK+ version. > > It seems that it may not be that hard. I'm going to give it a > shot, anyhow, at least asking Debian's Glib and GTK+ library > maintainers whether they know of a reason that it's a bad idea. > -- > Ben Pfaff > http://benpfaff.org > > > _______________________________________________ > pspp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev > > -- > PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 > fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 > See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key. > >
> _______________________________________________ > pspp-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
