John Darrington <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:51:22PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > I like the approach and the idea very much. > > The new dependency on gmake is a bit frustrating. I think that > $(patsubst %.xwd,%.eps,$(doc_pspp_images)) can be portably > written as $(doc_pspp_images:.xwd=.eps) but I don't see a good > way to avoid the "export" directive. Oh well (but we should at > least document the requirement). > > Yes. This patch also requires Imagemagick to be installed. If my > idea of autogenerating the screenshots works out, it'll also require > xfvb and a few other things too.
I guess that we should include the images in the Git repository to make PSPP easier to build. Then, only users who modify the GUI themselves will need the tools. > So maybe we should start a seperate branch to do this? That sounds reasonable. -- Ben Pfaff http://benpfaff.org _______________________________________________ pspp-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
